From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stover v. Bushnell Steel Products Division

Supreme Court of Florida
Jun 29, 1966
187 So. 2d 894 (Fla. 1966)

Opinion

No. 35285.

June 29, 1966.

Writ of Certiorari to the Florida Industrial Commission.

Leon H. Brush, Miami, Dick Lee, Sarasota, for petitioner.

Henderson, Franklin, Starnes Holt, Albert M. Frierson, Fort Myers, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.


By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date February 23, 1966.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The petition for attorneys' fees is also denied.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C.J., and THOMAS, O'CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Stover v. Bushnell Steel Products Division

Supreme Court of Florida
Jun 29, 1966
187 So. 2d 894 (Fla. 1966)
Case details for

Stover v. Bushnell Steel Products Division

Case Details

Full title:RAYMOND STOVER, PETITIONER, v. BUSHNELL STEEL PRODUCTS DIVISION, THE…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Jun 29, 1966

Citations

187 So. 2d 894 (Fla. 1966)