From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stovall v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama
Mar 13, 1952
57 So. 2d 641 (Ala. 1952)

Opinion

7 Div. 158.

March 13, 1952.

Merrill, Merrill Vardaman, Anniston, for petitioner.

Si Garrett, Atty Gen., opposed.


This is a petition by Jack Stovall for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that court in the case of Stovall v. State, 57 So.2d 641.

The petition is dismissed for failure to comply with the rule of this court requiring such petition to be presented on transcript paper. Supreme Court Rule 36, Code 1940, Title 7, Appendix; Bates v. General Steel Tank Co., Ala.Sup, 55 So.2d 218; Maddox v. City of Birmingham, 255 Ala. 440, 52 So.2d 166; Nix v. State, 251 Ala. 1, 36 So.2d 456; Barnett v. Pattillo, 251 Ala. 1, 36 So.2d 451; Anderson v. State, 251 Ala. 32, 36 So.2d 244; Farley v. State, 251 Ala. 391, 37 So.2d 440; Johns v. Thomas H. Vaughn Co., 251 Ala. 489, 38 So.2d 21; Haney v. State, 250 Ala. 664, 36 So.2d 117; Allen v. State, 249 Ala. 201, 30 So.2d 483; Peterson v. State, 248 Ala. 179, 27 So.2d 30. See Ex parte Wood, 215 Ala. 280, 110 So. 409.

Petition dismissed.

FOSTER, SIMPSON, and STAKELY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Stovall v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama
Mar 13, 1952
57 So. 2d 641 (Ala. 1952)
Case details for

Stovall v. State

Case Details

Full title:STOVALL v. STATE

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Mar 13, 1952

Citations

57 So. 2d 641 (Ala. 1952)
257 Ala. 116

Citing Cases

Stovall v. State

Affirmed. Petition for certiorari stricken by Supreme Court in Stovall v. State, 257 Ala. 116, 57 So.2d 641.…