Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.
CARA A.I. uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.
Drag a complaint or brief hereUpload a complaint or briefPDF documentWORD documentTXT documentOr, choose a document to uploadChoose DocumentSecure
Find on-point cases faster with CARA A.I.
§

Stout v. Bd. of Trs. of the Employees' Ret. Sys.

140 Haw. 177 (Haw. 2017)
Depth of Treatment
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newest
Cite Count
Stout v. Bd. of Trs. of the Employees' Ret. Sys.

3 Citing cases

  1. Santos v. Ito

    No. CAAP-17-0000477 (Haw. Ct. App. Feb. 24, 2023)

    "Statutory interpretation is a question of law reviewable de novo." Stout v. Bd. of Trs. of the Emps.' Ret. Sys., 140 Hawai'i 177, 185, 398 P.3d 766, 774 (2017) (citing Citizens Against Reckless Dev. v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 114 Hawai'i 184, 193, 159 P.3d 143, 152 (2007)).

  2. In re Emma

    465 P.3d 903 (Haw. 2020)   Cited 12 times

    Stout v. Bd. of Trs. of the Emps. Ret. Sys., 140 Hawai‘i 177, 185, 398 P.3d 766, 774 (2017). III.

  3. Avilla v. Ito

    No. CAAP-18-0000799 (Haw. Ct. App. Mar. 16, 2023)

    "Statutory interpretation is a question of law reviewable de novo." Stout v. Bd. of Trs. of the Emps.' Ret. Sys., 140 Hawai'i 177, 185, 398 P.3d 766, 774 (2017) (citing Citizens Against Reckless Dev. v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 114 Hawai'i 184, 193, 159 P.3d 143, 152 (2007)).