From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Storm v. King

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
Sep 3, 2015
NUMBER 13-15-00322-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 3, 2015)

Opinion

NUMBER 13-15-00322-CV

09-03-2015

JACK STORM, Appellant, v. RONNIE KING, Appellee.


On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3 of Nueces County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Benavides and Perkes
Memorandum OpinionPer Curiam

Appellant, Jack Storm, appeals a final judgment rendered against him following a jury verdict in cause number 2012CCV-60514-3 in the County Court at Law Number Three of Nueces County, Texas. Appellant has now filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal on grounds that the parties have settled and compromised the dispute at issue in the underlying suit and this appeal. Appellant thus requests that we dismiss this appeal with all costs to be assessed to the party incurring same.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant's motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED. Costs will be taxed against the party incurring same. See id. R. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Pending motions, if any, are likewise DISMISSED.

Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM Delivered and filed the 3rd day of September, 2015.


Summaries of

Storm v. King

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
Sep 3, 2015
NUMBER 13-15-00322-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 3, 2015)
Case details for

Storm v. King

Case Details

Full title:JACK STORM, Appellant, v. RONNIE KING, Appellee.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

Date published: Sep 3, 2015

Citations

NUMBER 13-15-00322-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 3, 2015)