From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Storey v. Vasbinder

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Oct 22, 2009
CASE NO. 06-CV-13194 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 22, 2009)

Opinion

CASE NO. 06-CV-13194.

October 22, 2009


ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY


Petitioner Mark Everett Storey has appealed the Court's denial of his habeas corpus petition and moved for a certificate of appealability. A certificate of appealability may issue "only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When, as here, the "district court has rejected the constitutional claims on the merits, the showing required to satisfy § 2253(c) is straightforward: The petitioner must demonstrate that reasonable jurists would find the district court's assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong." Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).

The holding in Slack would mean very little if appellate review were denied because the prisoner did not convince a judge, or, for that matter, three judges, that he or she would prevail. It is consistent with § 2253 that a [certificate of appealability] will issue in some instances where there is no certainty of ultimate relief. After all, when a [certificate of appealability] is sought, the whole premise is that the prisoner `has already failed in that endeavor.'
Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 337 (2003) (quoting Barefoot v. Estelle, 463 U.S. 880, 893 n. 4 (1983)).

Petitioner seeks a certificate of appealability on all his claims, which allege (1) ineffective assistance of trial counsel, (2) denial of discovery, (3) prosecutorial misconduct, (4) denial of the right of confrontation (preclusion of important cross-examination), (5) denial of the right of confrontation through the prosecutor's leading questions, (6) denial of the right to present a defense, (7) erroneous findings of fact, (8) violation of the Sixth Amendment right to have the fact finder evaluate the evidence, and (9) denial of due process through the cumulative effect of the errors. Reasonable jurists could debate the Court's resolution of these claims. Accordingly, Petitioner's motion for a certificate of appealability [dkt. #41] is GRANTED. A certificate of appealability may issue on all Petitioner's claims.


Summaries of

Storey v. Vasbinder

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Oct 22, 2009
CASE NO. 06-CV-13194 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 22, 2009)
Case details for

Storey v. Vasbinder

Case Details

Full title:MARK EVERETT STOREY, Petitioner, v. DOUGLAS VASBINDER, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Oct 22, 2009

Citations

CASE NO. 06-CV-13194 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 22, 2009)