Opinion
2:23-CV-01529-KKE
12-01-2023
TONNY STOREY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC, Defendant.
Charles C. Sipos, Bar No. 32825 Ellie F. Chapman, Bar No. 55881 PERKINS COIE LLP Counsel for Defendant Amazon.com Services LLC Scott D. Gilchrist (pro hac vice forthcoming) Irwin B. Levin (pro hac vice forthcoming) COHEN & MALAD, LLP Adam J. Berger, Bar No. 20714 Lindsay L. Halm, Bar No. 37141 Lily Ramseyer, Bar No. 57012 SHROETER GOLDMARK & BENDER Counsel for Plaintiff Tonny Storey
Charles C. Sipos, Bar No. 32825 Ellie F. Chapman, Bar No. 55881 PERKINS COIE LLP Counsel for Defendant Amazon.com Services LLC
Scott D. Gilchrist (pro hac vice forthcoming) Irwin B. Levin (pro hac vice forthcoming) COHEN & MALAD, LLP Adam J. Berger, Bar No. 20714 Lindsay L. Halm, Bar No. 37141 Lily Ramseyer, Bar No. 57012 SHROETER GOLDMARK & BENDER Counsel for Plaintiff Tonny Storey
STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Kymberly K. Evanson United States District Judge
STIPULATION
Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 7(d)(1) and 10(g), Plaintiff Tonny Storey and Defendant Amazon.com Services LLC (collectively, “the Parties”), by and through their respective attorneys, hereby move the Court to enter an order extending the deadlines contained in the Court's October 11, 2023 Order by two business days. Dkt. 9. In support of the foregoing request for relief, the Parties state as follows:
1. On September 15, 2023, Tonny Storey filed a putative class action complaint (“the Complaint”) against Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon.com Services LLC (“the Defendants”) in the Superior Court of Washington for King County. Defendants timely filed a Notice of Removal, removing the matter to this Court, Dkt. 1.
2. On October 11, 2023, the Parties filed a stipulated motion to dismiss Amazon.com, Inc. from this action and to set a briefing schedule for Amazon.com Services LLC's anticipated motion to dismiss. The Court granted the Parties' motion on October 11, 2023, Dkt. 9.
3. Defendant's deadline to respond to the Complaint is December 1, 2023. Dkt 9. Plaintiff's deadline to file an opposition is January 19, 2024, and Defendant's reply deadline is February 9, 2024. Id.
4. On November 30, 2023, the Parties' counsel engaged in a telephone call whereupon Defendant requested a modest extension of two business days to respond to the Complaint. The Parties agreed that the remaining briefing schedule for the anticipated motion to dismiss would also be extended by two business days.
5. Accordingly, the Parties stipulate and respectfully move the Court to enter an order extending the briefing schedule for Defendant's anticipated motion to dismiss as follows:
| Event | Current Deadline | New Deadline |
| Deadline for Defendant's motion to dismiss | December 1, 2023 | December 5, 2023 |
| Deadline for Plaintiff's Opposition to Motion to Dismiss | January 19, 2024 | January 23, 2024 |
| Deadline for Defendant's Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss | February 9, 2024 | February 13, 2024 |
6. The Parties have sought one prior extension of Defendant's deadline to respond to the Complaint, see Dkt. 8. Aside from altering the dates set in the Court's October 11, 2023 Order (Dkt. 9), the proposed briefing schedule will not impact any other previously scheduled dates in this matter.
ORDER
The parties' stipulated motion (Dkt. No. 15) is GRANTED. Defendant may file a motion to dismiss no later than December 5, 2023. Plaintiff may file an opposition no later than January 23, 2024. Defendant may file a reply no later than February 13, 2024.