From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

StoreBound LLC v. Sensio, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 21, 2022
22-CV-5967 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 21, 2022)

Opinion

22-CV-5967 (VSB)

10-21-2022

STOREBOUND LLC, Plaintiff, v. SENSIO INC. D/B/A MADE BY GATHER, Defendant.

BOCHETTO & LENTZ, P.C. Matthew L. Minsky, Esquire Gavin P. Lentz, Esquire Attorneys for Plaintiff STOREBOUND LLC LOCKE LORD LLP Scott D. Wofsy, Esquire Alicia Carroll, Esquire Attorneys for Defendant SENSIO d/b/a MADE BY GATHER


BOCHETTO & LENTZ, P.C.

Matthew L. Minsky, Esquire

Gavin P. Lentz, Esquire

Attorneys for Plaintiff

STOREBOUND LLC

LOCKE LORD LLP

Scott D. Wofsy, Esquire

Alicia Carroll, Esquire

Attorneys for Defendant

SENSIO d/b/a MADE BY GATHER

STIPULATED CONFIDENTIALITY AND PROTECTIVE ORDER

HON. VERNON S. BRODERICK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

WHEREAS, STOREBOUND LLC and SENSIO INC. D/B/A MADE BY GATHER (collectively the “Parties” and individually a “Party”) request that this Court issue a protective order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) to protect the confidentiality of nonpublic and competitively sensitive information that they may need to disclose in connection with discovery in this action;

WHEREAS, the Parties, through counsel, agree to the following terms; and

WHEREAS, this Court finds good cause exists for issuance of an appropriately tailored confidentiality order governing the pretrial phase of this action, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that any person subject to this Order - including without limitation the Parties to this action (including their respective corporate parents, successors, and assigns), their representatives, agents, experts and consultants, all third parties providing discovery in this action, and all other interested persons with actual or constructive notice of this Order - will adhere to the following terms, upon pain of contempt:

1. Each Party may designate as confidential for protection under this Order, in whole or in part, any “Discovery Material” (i.e., information of any kind produced or disclosed in the course of discovery in this action) that constitutes or includes, in whole or in part, confidential or proprietary information or trade secrets of the Party or a Third Party to whom the Party reasonably believes it owes an obligation of confidentiality with respect to such document, information or material (“Protected Material”). Protected Material shall be designated by the Party producing it by affixing a legend or stamp on such document, information or material as follows: “Confidential,” or “Restricted - Attorneys' Eyes Only” (“Designated Material”), With respect to Protected Material pursuant to this Order, no person subject to this Order may disclose such Protected Material to anyone else except as this Order expressly permits.

The term Designated Material is used throughout this Protective Order to refer to the class of materials designated as “Confidential,” or “Restricted Attorneys' Eyes Only,” both individually and collectively.

2. The Party or person producing or disclosing Discovery Material (“Producing Party”) may designate as Confidential only the portion of such material that it reasonably and in good faith believes consists of:

a. previously non-disclosed financial information (including without limitation profitability reports or estimates, percentage fees, design fees, royalty rates, minimum guarantee payments, sales reports, and sale margins);
b. previously non-disclosed material relating to ownership or control of any nonpublic company;
c. previously non-disclosed business plans, product-development information, or marketing plans;
d. any information of a personal or intimate nature regarding any individual; or e. any other category of information this Court subsequently affords confidential status.

3. With respect to the Protected Material portion of any Discovery Material other than deposition transcripts and exhibits, the Producing Party or its counsel may designate such portion as “Confidential” or “Attorneys' Eyes Only” by: (a) stamping or otherwise clearly marking as “Confidential” or “Attorneys' Eyes Only” the protected portion in a manner that will not interfere with legibility or audibility; and (b) producing for future public use another copy of said Discovery Material with the Protected Material portion redacted.

4. A Producing Party or its counsel may designate deposition exhibits or portions of deposition transcripts as Designated Material either by: (a) indicating on the record during the deposition that a question calls for Confidential information, in which case the reporter will bind the transcript of the designated testimony in a separate volume and mark it as “Confidential Information Governed by Protective Order;” or (b) notifying the reporter and all counsel of record, in writing, within 30 days after a deposition has concluded, of the specific pages and lines of the transcript that are to be designated “Confidential,” in which case all counsel receiving the transcript will be responsible for marking the copies of the designated transcript in their possession or under their control as directed by the Producing Party or that person's counsel. During the 30-day period following a deposition, all Parties will treat the entire deposition transcript as if it had been designated Confidential.

5. A designation of Protected Material (i.e., “Confidential,” or “Restricted - Attorneys' Eyes Only,”) may be made at any time. Inadvertent or unintentional production of documents, information or material that has not been designated as Designated Material shall not be deemed a waiver in whole or in part of a claim for confidential treatment. If at any time before the trial of this action a Producing Party realizes that it should have designated as “Confidential” or “Restricted - Attorneys' Eyes Only” some portion(s) of Protected Material that it previously produced without limitation, the Producing Party may so designate such material by so apprising all prior recipients in writing. Thereafter, this Court and all persons subject to this Order will treat such designated portion(s) of the Protected Material as Designated Material. Alternatively, any party that inadvertently or unintentionally produces Protected Material without designating it as Designated Material may request destruction of that Protected Material by notifying the recipient(s), as soon as reasonably possible after the producing Party becomes aware of the inadvertent or unintentional disclosure, and provide replacement Protected Material that is properly designated. The recipient(s) shall then destroy all copies of the inadvertently or unintentionally produced Protected Materials and any documents, information or material derived from or based thereon.

6. Nothing contained in this Order will be construed as: (a) a waiver by a Party or person of its right to object to any discovery request; (b) a waiver of any privilege or protection; or (c) a ruling regarding the admissibility at trial of any document, testimony, or other evidence.

7. Where a Producing Party has designated Discovery Material as Confidential, other persons subject to this Order may disclose such information only to the following persons:

a. the Parties to this action, their insurers, and counsel to their insurers;
b. counsel retained specifically for this action, including any paralegal, clerical, or other assistant that such outside counsel employs and assigns to this matter;
c. outside vendors or service providers (such as copy-service providers and document-management consultants) that counsel hire and assign to this matter;
d. any mediator or arbitrator that the Parties engage in this matter or that this Court appoints, and his or her staff, provided such person and said staff has first executed a Non-Disclosure Agreement in the form annexed as an Exhibit hereto;
e. as to any document, its author, its addressee, and any other person indicated on the face of the document as having received a copy;
f. any witness who counsel for a Party in good faith believes may be called to testify at trial or deposition in this action where the use of such Designated Materials is necessary for the purpose of examining that witness, provided that (1) such person has first executed a Non-Disclosure Agreement in the form annexed as an Exhibit hereto; and (2) the examining Party/ies give the other parties notice if they reasonably expect a deposition, hearing or other proceeding to include Protected Material so that the other parties can ensure that only authorized individuals are present at those proceedings;
g. any outside person (i.e., not existing employees or affiliates of a Party or an affiliate of a Party) a Party retains to serve as an expert witness or otherwise provide specialized advice to counsel in connection with this action, provided that: (1) such outside person is not presently employed by the Parties hereto for purposes other than this Action; and (2) such outside person has first executed a Non-Disclosure Agreement in the form annexed as an Exhibit hereto and the same is served upon the producing Party with a current curriculum vitae of the consultant or expert at least seven (7) days before access to the Designated
Material is to be given to that consultant, to allow the Producing Party to object to and notify the receiving Party in writing that it objects to disclosure of Designated Material to the consultant or expert;
h. stenographers engaged to transcribe depositions the Parties conduct in this action; and i. this Court, including any appellate court, its support personnel, and court reporters.

8. Before disclosing any Designated Material to any person referred to in subparagraphs 7(d) or 7(f) above, counsel must provide a copy of this Order to such person, who must sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement in the form annexed as an Exhibit hereto stating that he or she has read this Order and agrees to be bound by its terms. Said counsel must retain each signed Non-Disclosure Agreement, hold it in escrow, and produce it to opposing counsel either before such person is permitted to testify (at deposition or trial) or at the conclusion of the case, whichever comes first.

9. In accordance with paragraph 2 of this Court's Individual Practices, any party filing documents under seal must simultaneously file with the Court a letter brief and supporting declaration justifying - on a particularized basis - the continued sealing of such documents. The parties should be aware that the Court will unseal documents if it is unable to make “specific, on the record findings . . . demonstrating that closure is essential to preserve higher values and is narrowly tailored to serve that interest.” Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 120 (2d Cir. 2006).

10. The Court also retains discretion whether to afford confidential treatment to any Designated Material submitted to the Court in connection with any motion, application, or proceeding that may result in an order and/or decision by the Court. All persons are hereby placed on notice that the Court is unlikely to seal or otherwise afford confidential treatment to any Designated Material introduced in evidence at trial, even if such material has previously been sealed or designated as Confidential.

11. In filing Designated Material with this Court, or filing portions of any pleadings, motions, or other papers that disclose such Designated Material (“Confidential Court Submission”), the Parties shall publicly file a redacted copy of the Confidential Court Submission via the Electronic Case Filing System. The Parties shall file an unredacted copy of the Confidential Court Submission under seal with the Clerk of this Court, and the Parties shall serve this Court and opposing counsel with unredacted courtesy copies of the Confidential Court Submission.

12. Any Party who objects to any designation of confidentiality may at any time before the trial of this action serve upon counsel for the Producing Party a written notice stating with particularity the grounds of the objection. If the Parties cannot reach agreement promptly, counsel for all affected Parties will address their dispute to this Court in accordance with paragraph 4(E) of this Court's Individual Practices.

13. To the extent a Producing Party believes that certain Discovery Material, that qualifies to be designated as “Confidential” pursuant to this Order, is so sensitive that its dissemination deserves even further limitation, the Producing Party may designate such Protected Material as “Restricted - Attorneys' Eyes Only.”

14. For Protected Material designated “Restricted - Attorneys' Eyes Only” access to, and disclosure of, such Protected Material shall be limited to individuals listed in paragraphs 7(b)-(d) and (f) and (g).

15. Recipients of Designated Material under this Order may use such material solely for the prosecution and defense of this action and any appeals thereto, and not for any business, commercial, or competitive purpose or in any other litigation proceeding. Nothing contained in this Order, however, will affect or restrict the rights of any Party with respect to its own documents or information produced in this action.

16. Nothing in this Order will prevent any Party from producing any Designated Material in its possession in response to a lawful subpoena or other compulsory process, or if required to produce by law or by any government agency having jurisdiction, provided that such Party gives written notice to the Producing Party as soon as reasonably possible, and if permitted by the time allowed under the request, at least 10 days before any disclosure. Upon receiving such notice, the Producing Party will bear the burden to oppose compliance with the subpoena, other compulsory process, or other legal notice if the Producing Party deems it appropriate to do so.

17. Each person who has access to Designated Material pursuant to this Order must take all due precautions to prevent the unauthorized or inadvertent disclosure of such material.

18. Within 60 days of the final disposition of this action - including all appeals - all recipients of Designated Material must either return it - including all copies thereof - to the Producing Party, or, upon permission of the Producing Party, destroy such material -including all copies thereof. In either event, by the 60-day deadline, the recipient must certify its return or destruction by submitting a written certification to the Producing Party that affirms that it has not retained any copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries, or other forms of reproducing or capturing any of the Designated Material.

Notwithstanding this provision, the attorneys that the Parties have specifically retained for this action may retain an archival copy of all pleadings, motion papers, transcripts, expert reports, legal memoranda, correspondence, or attorney work product, even if such materials contain Designated Material. Any such archival copies that contain or constitute Designated Material remain subject to this Order.

19. This Order will survive the termination of the litigation and will continue to be binding upon all persons to whom Designated Material is produced or disclosed.

20. This Court will retain jurisdiction over all persons subject to this Order to the extent necessary to enforce any obligations arising hereunder or to impose sanctions for any contempt thereof.

SO STIPULATED AND AGREED.

SO ORDERED.

NON-DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT

I, ________, acknowledge that I have read and understand the Protective Order in this action governing the non-disclosure of those portions of Discovery Material that have been designated as “Confidential,” or “Restricted - Attorneys' Eyes Only.” I agree that I will not disclose such Designated Material to anyone other than for purposes of this litigation and that at the conclusion of the litigation I will return or destroy all Discovery Material to the Party or attorney from whom I received it. By acknowledging these obligations under the Protective Order, I understand that I am submitting myself to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for the purpose of any issue or dispute arising hereunder and that my willful violation of any term of the Protective Order could subject me to punishment for contempt of Court.


Summaries of

StoreBound LLC v. Sensio, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 21, 2022
22-CV-5967 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 21, 2022)
Case details for

StoreBound LLC v. Sensio, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:STOREBOUND LLC, Plaintiff, v. SENSIO INC. D/B/A MADE BY GATHER, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Oct 21, 2022

Citations

22-CV-5967 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 21, 2022)