From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stoneham v. Bondy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1936
248 App. Div. 787 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Opinion

June, 1936.


In an action to compel an accounting by trustees under certain trust agreements, order dismissing plaintiffs' amended complaint for failure to state a cause of action reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. In our opinion, the language of the last paragraph in each of the agreements in question shows that they are made "in lieu of" and "to take the place" of the prior agreement and to cancel such prior agreement. No allegation of cancellation of such prior agreement is, therefore, necessary. Defendants may serve an answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. Lazansky, P.J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Stoneham v. Bondy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1936
248 App. Div. 787 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)
Case details for

Stoneham v. Bondy

Case Details

Full title:MARGARET LEONARD STONEHAM, as General Guardian of the Person and Property…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1936

Citations

248 App. Div. 787 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Citing Cases

Stoneham v. Bondy

The rights of the parties under one or both of the agreements mentioned in the record must be determined on a…