From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stoneburner v. Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Optometry

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 27, 1990
571 So. 2d 6 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 89-00943.

April 27, 1990.

Appeal from the Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Optometry.

Neil F. Garfield of Law Offices of Neil F. Garfield, P.A., Lauderhill, for appellant.

Lisa S. Nelson, Department of Professional Regulation, Tallahassee, for appellee.


Respondent, an optometrist, appeals from a final order of the Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Optometry. The order, inter alia, increased by $5000 the administrative fine recommended by the hearing officer for respondent's violation of section 463.016(1)(e) and (g), Florida Statutes (1985). We affirm in part and reverse in part.

We find no merit in respondent's contentions on appeal except for one which the Board concedes. That is that the Board in its final order increased the recommended fine by $5000 without stating with particularity its reasons for so doing and without citing to the record to justify its action, as required by section 120.57(1)(b)9. Therefore, the Board's $5000 increase in the administrative fine is stricken.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and LEHAN and PARKER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Stoneburner v. Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Optometry

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 27, 1990
571 So. 2d 6 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

Stoneburner v. Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Optometry

Case Details

Full title:JON F. STONEBURNER, O.D., APPELLANT, v. DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Apr 27, 1990

Citations

571 So. 2d 6 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)