From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stone v. Scheid

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 4, 2011
2:09-cv-2139-GEB-GGH (E.D. Cal. Apr. 4, 2011)

Opinion

2:09-cv-2139-GEB-GGH.

April 4, 2011


ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS


The Court filed a tentative ruling on March 22, 2011, in which it granted Defendant Tammie Scheid judgment on the pleadings. (ECF No. 34.) Plaintiff was given seven (7) days to respond to the tentative ruling and was warned that the "tentative ruling will become the order of this Court if a timely response to this tentative ruling is not filed." Id. Plaintiff has failed to file a response within the prescribed time period. Therefore, the Court adopts the tentative ruling filed March 22, 2011 as its order and grants Defendant judgment on the pleadings. Further, the Court previously dismissed with prejudice Plaintiff's claims against Defendants California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Matthew Cate, Glenda Pressly, and Nancy Hanley. (ECF Nos. 13, 18.) Therefore, judgment shall be entered judgment in favor of Defendants.

Dated: April 1, 2011


Summaries of

Stone v. Scheid

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 4, 2011
2:09-cv-2139-GEB-GGH (E.D. Cal. Apr. 4, 2011)
Case details for

Stone v. Scheid

Case Details

Full title:EDITH STONE, Plaintiff, v. TAMMIE SCHEID, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Apr 4, 2011

Citations

2:09-cv-2139-GEB-GGH (E.D. Cal. Apr. 4, 2011)