From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stone v. Lopez

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 23, 2010
No. 2:10-cv-1725 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 23, 2010)

Opinion

No. 2:10-cv-1725 KJN P.

July 23, 2010


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding without counsel, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis. In his application, petitioner challenges a conviction issued by the Kings County Superior Court. Kings County is part of the Fresno Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. See Local Rule 120(d).

Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper division of a court may, on the court's own motion, be transferred to the proper division of the court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of the court. This court will not rule on petitioner's request to proceed in forma pauperis.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. This court has not ruled on petitioner's request to proceed in forma pauperis;

2. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California sitting in Fresno; and

3. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned and shall be filed at:

United States District Court
Eastern District of California
2500 Tulare Street
Fresno, CA 93721


Summaries of

Stone v. Lopez

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 23, 2010
No. 2:10-cv-1725 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 23, 2010)
Case details for

Stone v. Lopez

Case Details

Full title:NICHOLAS SCOTT STONE, Petitioner, v. R. LOPEZ, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jul 23, 2010

Citations

No. 2:10-cv-1725 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 23, 2010)