From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stone v. Jesson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
May 25, 2017
Case No. 11-cv-0951 (WMW/HB) (D. Minn. May. 25, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 11-cv-0951 (WMW/HB)

05-25-2017

Charles Richard Stone, Plaintiff, v. Lucinda E. Jesson, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on the May 4, 2017 Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer. (Dkt. 59.) The R&R recommends denying Plaintiff Charles Richard Stone's motion for class certification. Objections to the R&R have not been filed in the time period permitted. In the absence of timely objections, this Court reviews an R&R for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee's note to 1983 amendment ("When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation."); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Having reviewed the R&R, the Court finds no clear error.

ORDER

Based on the R&R and all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. The May 4, 2017 R&R, (Dkt. 59), is ADOPTED; and

2. Plaintiff Charles Richard Stone's motion for class certification, (Dkt. 55), is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Dated: May 25, 2017

s/Wilhelmina M. Wright

Wilhelmina M. Wright

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Stone v. Jesson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
May 25, 2017
Case No. 11-cv-0951 (WMW/HB) (D. Minn. May. 25, 2017)
Case details for

Stone v. Jesson

Case Details

Full title:Charles Richard Stone, Plaintiff, v. Lucinda E. Jesson, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Date published: May 25, 2017

Citations

Case No. 11-cv-0951 (WMW/HB) (D. Minn. May. 25, 2017)