Opinion
3:12-cv-00555-RCJ-WGC
04-19-2013
JEREMY THOMAS STONE, Plaintiff, v. DEPUTY COLLINS, et al., Defendants.
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING
MINUTES OF THE COURT
PRESENT: THE HONORABLE WILLIAM G. COBB, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEPUTY CLERK: KATIE LYNN OGDEN REPORTER: NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:
Before the court is the Defendants' "Unopposed Motion to Request Extension to File a Responsive Complaint Pursuant to LR 6-2 (First Request). (Doc. # 16.) Defendants seek an extension of the deadline to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint to and including Monday, April 30, 2013.
Although the motion is entitled as "unopposed," there is nothing in either the motion or the declaration attached thereto which states that counsel for Defendants has contacted the Plaintiff to receive his approval of the extension. While the court cannot therefore consider the motion "unopposed," nevertheless, counsel for Defendants has shown good cause for an enlargement of time to respond to Plaintiff's complaint.
Good cause appearing, Defendants' motion (Doc. # 16) is GRANTED. Defendants shall have to and including April 30, 2013, within which to file a response to Plaintiff's complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK
By: _____
Deputy Clerk