Stone Coal Corporation v. Varney

1 Citing case

  1. Saxton v. Commonwealth

    671 S.W.3d 1 (Ky. 2022)   Cited 9 times
    In Saxton v. Commonwealth, 671 S.W.3d 1, 15 (Ky. 2022), we explained, "Deal addressed the issue of a video being shown of the defendant in custody and wearing jail attire, an inherently prejudicial circumstance.

    Saxton cannot stipulate that the swab was taken and sent to the lab, then complain the chain of custody is incomplete due to lack of testimony about how the swab was originally taken and sent to the lab.Stone Coal Corp. v. Varney , 336 S.W.2d 41, 42 (Ky. 1960) (finding stipulation that deposition could be read into record precluded review of alleged error in allowing the deposition to be read into record). The trial court erroneously told the jury the swab was delivered to the lab on July 9, 2020.