From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stolz v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
Dec 22, 1994
669 So. 2d 1013 (Ala. Crim. App. 1994)

Opinion

CR-93-0397.

August 19, 1994. Rehearing Denied September 30, 1994. Certiorari Denied December 22, 1994 Alabama Supreme Court 1940079.

Appeal from Madison Circuit Court (CC-93-1149); Daniel Banks, Judge.

Jackie Ferguson, Huntsville, for appellant.

James H. Evans, Atty. Gen., and Joseph Marston, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.


AFFIRMED. NO OPINION.

BOWEN, P.J., and PATTERSON and McMILLAN, JJ., concur.

TAYLOR, J., concurs in result only with opinion.


CONCURRING IN RESULT ONLY OF UNPUBLISHED MEMORANDUM


I concur in the result only for the reasons stated in Tillery v. State, 647 So.2d 87 (Ala.Cr.App. 1994). In Tillery, this court stated:

"Based on an examination of Boykin [v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969)]; Rule 14.4, Ala.R.Crim.P.; and Alabama case law, we find that the factual basis requirement is not a component of the determination of whether a defendant had voluntarily entered a plea of guilty. Therefore, Bennett [v. State, 649 So.2d 214 (Ala. 1994)], Parish [v. State, 660 So.2d 231 (Ala. 1994)], Cantu [v. State, 660 So.2d 1026 (Ala. 1994)], and Gordon [v. Nagle, 647 So.2d 91 (Ala. 1994),] are not applicable and this issue is not reviewable by this court because the appellant's contention concerning the factual basis of his plea was not preserved for appellate review."

647 So.2d at 89-90.


Summaries of

Stolz v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
Dec 22, 1994
669 So. 2d 1013 (Ala. Crim. App. 1994)
Case details for

Stolz v. State

Case Details

Full title:John Paul STOLZ v. STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Dec 22, 1994

Citations

669 So. 2d 1013 (Ala. Crim. App. 1994)