From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stoller v. Consumer Fin. Prot. Bureau

Supreme Court of the United States
Jan 11, 2016
577 U.S. 1057 (2016)

Opinion

No. 15–6932.

01-11-2016

Christopher STOLLER, petitioner, v. CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, et al.


Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for a writ of certiorari dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) (per curiam ).


Summaries of

Stoller v. Consumer Fin. Prot. Bureau

Supreme Court of the United States
Jan 11, 2016
577 U.S. 1057 (2016)
Case details for

Stoller v. Consumer Fin. Prot. Bureau

Case Details

Full title:Christopher STOLLER, petitioner, v. CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU…

Court:Supreme Court of the United States

Date published: Jan 11, 2016

Citations

577 U.S. 1057 (2016)
136 S. Ct. 879
193 L. Ed. 2d 703