From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stokes v. Vales Construction Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 24, 2000
269 A.D.2d 274 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

February 24, 2000

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Lippmann, J.), entered June 12, 1998, which, upon a jury verdict, found defendant Vales Construction Corp. not negligent, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the complaint reinstated against Vales and the matter remanded for a new trial.

Martin Diennor, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Elizabeth Anne Bannon, for Defendant-Respondent.

ROSENBERGER, J.P., NARDELLI, MAZZARELLI, ELLERIN, ANDRIAS, JJ.


The trial court erred when it refused to take "judicial cognizance" of Administrative Code of the City of New York §§ 19-105, 19-106 and 19-107 and to instruct the jury on their meaning and application. The failure to do so deprived plaintiff 1991 of a fair trial and this error, standing alone, is sufficient to require reversal of the judgment (Chanler v. Manocherian, 151 A.D.2d 432, 434; McDonald v. New York City Health Hosps. Corp., 203 A.D.2d 6).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Stokes v. Vales Construction Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 24, 2000
269 A.D.2d 274 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Stokes v. Vales Construction Corp.

Case Details

Full title:SOPHIE STOKES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VALES CONSTRUCTION CORP.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 24, 2000

Citations

269 A.D.2d 274 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
704 N.Y.S.2d 455