From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stokes v. Township of Piscataway, Zoning Board

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Dec 31, 1991
606 A.2d 353 (N.J. 1991)

Opinion

December 31, 1991.


Leave to appeal is granted, and the order of the trial court is summarily modified to permit plaintiff to perform only such roofing and siding work as may be necessary to protect the structure from damage during the pendency of the litigation; and it is further

ORDERED that any such work shall be undertaken at plaintiff's own risk and without prejudice to the township's right to have such work removed on completion of the litigation should plaintiff fail to prevail. See Rowatti v. Gonchar, 101 N.J. 46, 500 A.2d 381 (1985). Jurisdiction is not retained.


Summaries of

Stokes v. Township of Piscataway, Zoning Board

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Dec 31, 1991
606 A.2d 353 (N.J. 1991)
Case details for

Stokes v. Township of Piscataway, Zoning Board

Case Details

Full title:ASHOK STOKES, v. TOWNSHIP OF PISCATAWAY AND ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Dec 31, 1991

Citations

606 A.2d 353 (N.J. 1991)
606 A.2d 353

Citing Cases

Reed v. Philadelphia

A pedestrian in crossing a public street may cross at any convenient place: McIlhenny v. Phila., 214 Pa. 44.…