Opinion
Civil Action 23-114 24-2127
07-19-2024
MARK STOKES, et al, Plaintiff, v. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. MARK STOKES, et al, Plaintiff, v. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant, v. BERNARDO RODRIGUEZ TREJO, Respondent.
ORDER
PAMELA A. CARLOS, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
AND NOW, this 19th day of July, 2024, upon careful consideration of Plaintiffs' motion to compel the deposition and production of documents by Bernardo Rodriguez Trejo (Doc. No 1, Civ. Action No. 24-2127), Plaintiffs' motion to transfer the civil action to the arbitration program (Doc. No. 50), Plaintiffs' motion for leave to file an amended complaint (Doc. No. 55), and Defendant's motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 41), together with any and all responses thereto, and for the reasons explained more fully in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. Plaintiffs' motion to compel the deposition and production of documents by Bernardo Rodriguez Trejo (Doc. No 1, Civ. Action No. 24-2127) is DENIED.
2. Plaintiffs' motion for leave to file an amended complaint (Doc. No. 55) is DENIED.
3. Defendant New Jersey Manufacturer's Insurance Company's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 41) is GRANTED.
4. Judgment is ENTERED in favor of Defendant New Jersey Manufacturer's Insurance Company and against Plaintiff Mark Stokes and Plaintiff Kimberly Stokes on all claims.
5. Plaintiffs' motion to transfer the civil action to the arbitration program (Doc. No. 50) is DENIED as moot.
6. The Parties' pending motions in limine (Doc. Nos. 57, 58, 59, 60, 63, 64, and 65) are DENIED as moot.
7. The Clerk of Court shall mark this case CLOSED for all purposes including statistics.