From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stokes v. Moorman

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jan 4, 2011
406 F. App'x 823 (4th Cir. 2011)

Opinion

No. 10-7411.

Submitted: December 21, 2010.

Decided: January 4, 2011.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (9:10-cv-01711-CMC).

Charles Michael Stokes, Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Charles M. Stokes appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Stokes v. Moorman, No. 9:10-cv-01711-CMC, 2010 WL 3834470 (D.S.C. Sept. 27, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Stokes v. Moorman

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jan 4, 2011
406 F. App'x 823 (4th Cir. 2011)
Case details for

Stokes v. Moorman

Case Details

Full title:Charles Michael STOKES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Andrew MOORMAN, sued in…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jan 4, 2011

Citations

406 F. App'x 823 (4th Cir. 2011)

Citing Cases

United States v. Aldublin-Robleto

Moreover, to the extent that Aldublin-Robleto is challenging the imposition of supervised release, he has…