Stokes v. Marsh

Full title: JOSHUA STOKES, Petitioner v. ROBERT MARSH et a/., Respondents

Court: United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 11, 2022

Civil Action 19-3019 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 11, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 19-3019

03-11-2022

JOSHUA STOKES, Petitioner v. ROBERT MARSH et a/., Respondents

GENE E.K. PRATTER JUDGE

ORDER

GENE E.K. PRATTER JUDGE

AND NOW, this 11^th day of March, 2022, upon careful and independent consideration of Petitioner Joshua Stokes's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 1), the Respondents' Response to the Petition (Doc. No. 12), Magistrate Judge Marilyn Heffley's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 8), and Mr. Stokes's Objections to the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 33), and for the reasons given in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

3. There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability.

4. The Clerk of the Court shall mark this case CLOSED, including for statistical purposes.