From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stokes v. Benham

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Dec 21, 2015
626 F. App'x 431 (4th Cir. 2015)

Opinion

No. 15-1848

12-21-2015

YOLANDA W. STOKES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. STEVEN BENHAM, individually and in his capacity as Executive Director of the Hopewell Redevelopment and Housing Authority; LINWOOD CRENSHAW, individually and in his capacity as Commissioner-(CHAIRMAN) of the Hopewell Redevelopment and Housing Authority; MIKE MAHANEY, a/k/a Michael L. Mahaney, individually and in his capacity as Commissioner-(VICE CHAIRMAN) of the Hopewell Redevopment and Housing Authority; JOHNNY JONES, individually and in his capacity as Commissioner of the Hopewell Redevelopment and Housing Authority; RENEE BROXIE, individually in her capacity as Commissioner of the Hopewell Redevelopment and Housing Authority; SHEILA FLOWERS, individually and in her capacity as Commissioner of the Hopewell Redevelopment and Housing Authority; MICHAEL BUJAKOWSKI, individually and in his capacity as the Mayor of the City of Hopewell, Virginia; JASMENE GORE, a/k/a Jasmine Gore, individually and in her capacity as the Vice-Mayor of the City of Hopewell, Virginia; WAYNE WALTON, individually and in his capacity as Councilor for the City of Hopewell, Virginia; JACKIE SHORNAK, individually and in her capacity as Councilor for the City of Hopewell, Virginia; ROOSEVELT EDWARDS, individually and in his capacity as Councilor for the City of Hopewell, Virginia; CHRISTINA LUMINA-BAILEY, Individually and in her Capacity as Councilor of the City of Hopewell; HOPEWELL REDEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING AUTHORITY, ET AL; JAMES VERGARA, Staff Attorney, Hopewell Redevelopment and Housing Authority; TINA RAATZ, Housing Manager, Thomas Rolfe Court, Hopewell Redevelopment and Housing Authority; GREG PE-AY, Housing Manager, Piper Square Apartments, Hopewell Redevelopment and Housing Authority; THE HOPEWELL CITY COUNCIL, Defendants - Appellees.

Yolanda W. Stokes, Appellant Pro Se. John Anthony Conrad, CONRAD FIRM, Richmond, Virginia; Jeremy David Capps, HARMAN, CLAYTOR, CORRIGAN & WELLMAN, Richmond, Virginia; Melissa Yvonne York, HARMAN CLAYTOR CORRIGAN & WELLMAN, Glen Allen, Virginia, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., District Judge. (3:14-cv-00536-JAG) Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Yolanda W. Stokes, Appellant Pro Se. John Anthony Conrad, CONRAD FIRM, Richmond, Virginia; Jeremy David Capps, HARMAN, CLAYTOR, CORRIGAN & WELLMAN, Richmond, Virginia; Melissa Yvonne York, HARMAN CLAYTOR CORRIGAN & WELLMAN, Glen Allen, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Yolanda W. Stokes appeals the district court's order dismissing her civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Stokes v. Benham, No. 3:14-cv-00536-JAG (E.D. Va. July 8, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Stokes v. Benham

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Dec 21, 2015
626 F. App'x 431 (4th Cir. 2015)
Case details for

Stokes v. Benham

Case Details

Full title:YOLANDA W. STOKES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. STEVEN BENHAM, individually…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Dec 21, 2015

Citations

626 F. App'x 431 (4th Cir. 2015)

Citing Cases

Taylor v. Nat'l Invs.

See, e.g., Campos v. HMK Mortg., LLC, 458 F.Supp.3d 517, 532 (N.D. Tex. 2020) (“[I]f the Supreme Court or…

Moore v. Vilsack

To allege a plausible retaliation claim under the Rehabilitation Act, a plaintiff must provide sufficient…