From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stokely v. UMG Recordings, Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Nov 22, 2016
144 A.D.3d 575 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

11-22-2016

William E. STOKELY, III, etc., et al., Plaintiffs–Respondents, v. UMG RECORDINGS, INC., et al., Defendants, Universal Music Publishing Inc., Defendant–Appellant.

Sidley Austin LLP, New York (Eric G. Hoffman of counsel), for appellant. Virginia & Ambinder, LLP, New York (LaDonna M. Lusher of counsel), for respondents.


Sidley Austin LLP, New York (Eric G. Hoffman of counsel), for appellant.

Virginia & Ambinder, LLP, New York (LaDonna M. Lusher of counsel), for respondents.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Cynthia S. Kern, J.), entered January 28, 2016, which denied defendant Universal Music Publishing Inc.'s motion to dismiss the second amended complaint as against it, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

On behalf of himself and others similarly situated, plaintiff William E. Stokely, III, seeks unpaid minimum wage and overtime compensation from defendants Universal Music Publishing Inc. and UMG Recordings, Inc., which entities the complaint refers to “collectively” as “Defendant.” Plaintiff alleges that he worked as an unpaid intern for “Defendant.” In support of his allegation that defendants are single and/or joint employers, plaintiff asserts bare legal conclusions (see Ullmann v. Norma Kamali, Inc., 207 A.D.2d 691, 692, 616 N.Y.S.2d 583 [1st Dept.1994] ). There are no factual allegations that would support a finding of joint- or single-employer liability against Universal (see e.g. Shiflett v. Scores Holding Co., Inc., 601 Fed.Appx. 28, 30 [2d Cir.2015] ; Batilo v. Mary Manning Walsh Nursing Home Co., Inc., 140 A.D.3d 637, 33 N.Y.S.3d 715 [1st Dept.2016] )

FRIEDMAN, J.P., SAXE, RICHTER, GISCHE, KAPNICK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Stokely v. UMG Recordings, Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Nov 22, 2016
144 A.D.3d 575 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

Stokely v. UMG Recordings, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:William E. STOKELY, III, etc., et al., Plaintiffs–Respondents, v. UMG…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 22, 2016

Citations

144 A.D.3d 575 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 7871
40 N.Y.S.3d 904