From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stoglin v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Nov 5, 2014
2014-3100 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 5, 2014)

Opinion

2014-3100

11-05-2014

COREY DEMOND STOGLIN, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent.


NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. CH-3330-12-0390-I-2.

ON MOTION

ORDER

The Department of Labor moves to reform the caption to designate the Merit Systems Protection Board ("Board") as the respondent and for an extension of time for the Board to file its response brief.

Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7703(a)(2), the Board is designated as the respondent when the Board's decision concerns the procedure or jurisdiction of the Board. The employing agency is designated as the respondent when the Board reaches the merits of the underlying case. Here, the Board dismissed Corey Demond Stoglin's petition as untimely. Thus, the Board is the proper respondent in this petition for review.

Because Stoglin has not timely filed a brief as required by this court's September 11, 2014 order, his petition is dismissed for failure to prosecute. Thus, the motion for an extension of time is moot.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motions are granted to the extent that the Board is substituted for the Department of Labor. The revised official caption is reflected above.

(2) The petition is dismissed for failure to timely file a brief.

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Daniel E. O'Toole

Daniel E. O'Toole

Clerk of Court
s27 ISSUED AS A MANDATE: November 5, 2014


Summaries of

Stoglin v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Nov 5, 2014
2014-3100 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 5, 2014)
Case details for

Stoglin v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

Case Details

Full title:COREY DEMOND STOGLIN, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Nov 5, 2014

Citations

2014-3100 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 5, 2014)