The chancellor dismissed the bill and the matter was brought here for review. It appeared that the appellee had secured an outstanding mortgage to which the deed and the purchase price mortgage were, under the option, to have been subject and had offered the appellant a first mortgage, instead of a second one. Inasmuch as the appellant had been offered more than she was to receive, that is, a first mortgage to secure the balance, and appellee had taken an assignment of the outstanding mortgage instead of receiving title subject to the indebtedness it secured, we decided that the appellant could not prevail in her effort to defeat the suit and we reversed the decree of dismissal. Stoffer v. Adams, Fla., 54 So.2d 801. After the mandate reached the chancellor he permitted the appellant to answer, whereupon some of the allegations of the bill were admitted, some denied, and four affirmative defenses were put forth.