From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stoehner Serv. v. S. Bell Telephone

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Dec 13, 1988
533 So. 2d 897 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Opinion

Nos. 87-1768, 87-2949.

November 9, 1988. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied December 13, 1988.

Consolidated appeals from the Circuit Court for Broward County; Estella May Moriarty, Judge.

Jesse C. Jones and John L. Chalif of Bailey, Dawes Hunt, Miami, for appellant.

John R. Hargrove of Tew, Jorden Schulte, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.


We sua sponte consolidate these actions and reverse the trial court's entry of summary judgment against appellant on its claims for fraud and intentional interference with a contract. We believe factual issues exist as to appellee Bell South's responsibility for its manager's and other employees' interference in a contract between appellant and Southern Bell. Similarly, we believe a fact issue exists as to Southern Bell's responsibility for fraud in entering into the contract with the appellant knowing that the agent delegated to supervise the contract intended to prevent the appellant from successfully performing the contract.

LETTS and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

ANSTEAD, J., dissents in part with opinion.


I agree that a fact issue exists in the intentional interference action, but I would affirm the trial court's judgment on the fraud action.


Summaries of

Stoehner Serv. v. S. Bell Telephone

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Dec 13, 1988
533 So. 2d 897 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)
Case details for

Stoehner Serv. v. S. Bell Telephone

Case Details

Full title:STOEHNER SERVICE SYSTEMS OF FLORIDA, INC., APPELLANT, v. SOUTHERN BELL…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Dec 13, 1988

Citations

533 So. 2d 897 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)