Stoddard v. Singer, 2021 ND 23, ¶¶ 6-7, 954 N.W.2d 696 (quoting Vandal v. Leno, 2014 ND 45, ¶ 6, 843 N.W.2d 313) (citations omitted).

[¶4] Travis Hoffman argues the district court erred in denying his motion to modify residential responsibility by applying the heightened standard to his motion and, alternatively, finding he failed to satisfy that standard. "A district court's decision on whether to modify primary residential responsibility is a finding of fact, which will not be reversed on appeal unless it is clearly erroneous." Stoddard v. Singer, 2021 ND 23, ¶ 6, 954 N.W.2d 696. A finding of fact is clearly erroneous if it is induced by an erroneous view of the law, there is no evidence to support it, or if the Court is convinced, on the entire record, a mistake has been made.

"This Court defers to the district court's ability to judge the credibility of witnesses, and resolves contradictory testimony in favor of affirmance." City of West Fargo v. Medbery, 2021 ND 81, ¶ 15, 959 N.W.2d 568; see also Stoddard v. Singer, 2021 ND 23, ¶ 18, 954 N.W.2d 696 (deference is given to the district court's credibility determinations when the court is presented with disputed evidence); Schaffner v. Schaffner, 2017 ND 170, ¶ 10, 898 N.W.2d 428 ("We defer to the district court's weighing of the evidence and assessment of witness credibility.").

Stoddard v. Singer, 2021 ND 23, ¶ 23, 954 N.W.2d 696.

. . . Under the clearly erroneous standard of review, this Court will not "reweigh the evidence, reassess the credibility of witnesses, or substitute [its] own judgment for a district court's initial decision." Stoddard v. Singer, 2021 ND 23, ¶¶ 6-7, 954 N.W.2d 696 (internal citations omitted). [¶8] Post-judgment modifications of residential responsibility based on stipulated joint residential responsibility are governed by N.D.C.C. § 14-09-06.6.

A finding of fact is clearly erroneous if it is induced by an erroneous view of the law, if no evidence supports it, or if the reviewing court, on the entire evidence, is left with a definite and firm conviction a mistake has been made. Stoddard v. Singer , 2021 ND 23, ¶ 6, 954 N.W.2d 696. [¶7] This Court has not precisely defined "regular use."