(See discussion, Williston on Contracts [rev.ed.], ยง 714.)" ( Whitfield v. Jessup, 31 Cal.2d 826, 828 [ 193 P.2d 1].) [3] Apparently the rule was, before the uniform act, as to the sale of personal property generally that an acceptance of the goods by the buyer, knowing of the breach of warranty, constituted a waiver by him of a claim for damages for the breach, at least unless he gave notice of his complaint within a reasonable time. (See Streff v. Gold Medal Creamery Co., 96 Cal.App. 18 [ 273 P. 831]; Gladium Co., Inc. v. Thatcher, 95 Cal.App. 85 [ 272 P. 340]; Stockton Lbr. Co. v. Mulcahy, 86 Cal.App. 505 [ 260 P. 897]; American Steel Pipe etc. Co. v. Hubbard, 42 Cal.App. 520 [ 183 P. 830]; Burrell v. Southern Calif. C. Co., 35 Cal.App. 162 [ 169 P. 405]; Doak Gas Engine Co. v. Fraser, 168 Cal. 624 [ 143 P. 1024]; Byron Jackson Machine Works v. Duff, 158 Cal. 47 [ 109 P. 616]; Pigott v. Clark, 133 Cal.App. 53 [ 23 P.2d 800]; 22 Cal.Jur. 983-988.) The same rule is stated in the Restatement.