From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stocks v. Schriro

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Oct 22, 2009
No. 06-17053 (9th Cir. Oct. 22, 2009)

Opinion

No. 06-17053.

Submitted October 13, 2009.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

October 22, 2009.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Roslyn O. Silver, District Judge, Presiding D.C. No. CV-03-01510-ROS.

Before: B. FLETCHER, LEAVY, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Arizona state prisoner David Paul Stocks appeals from the district court's judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.

Stocks contends the state prosecutor did not present sufficient evidence of the offense dates of his prior convictions which the sentencing court used to enhance his sentence. Stocks has not shown that the Arizona Court of Appeals' decision rejecting this claim was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States, or was based on an unreasonable determination of facts in light of the evidence presented in the state court proceeding. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Stocks v. Schriro

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Oct 22, 2009
No. 06-17053 (9th Cir. Oct. 22, 2009)
Case details for

Stocks v. Schriro

Case Details

Full title:DAVID PAUL STOCKS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. DORA B. SCHRIRO, et al.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Oct 22, 2009

Citations

No. 06-17053 (9th Cir. Oct. 22, 2009)