From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stocks v. Office Max Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 1, 2011
CASE NO. 1:11-CV-00644 LJO-SKO (E.D. Cal. Aug. 1, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:11-CV-00644 LJO-SKO

08-01-2011

RONALD STOCKS, Plaintiff v. OFFICE MAX INCORPORATED and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive Defendants.

Penner, Bradley & Simonian By Peter Sean Bradley Attorneys for Plaintiff Littler Mendelson By Timothy S. Anderson Attorneys for Defendant


PETER SEAN BRADLEY, ESQ., #109258

PENNER, BRADLEY & SIMONIAN

Attorney for Plaintiff, Ronald Stocks

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE

PROPER CORPORATE DEFENDANT

The parties through their attorneys hereby stipulate that the proper corporate defendant is OfficeMax North America, Inc. and that all references to Office Max Incorporated in the complaint on file in this action are amended to read "OfficeMax North America, Inc."

Penner, Bradley & Simonian

By Peter Sean Bradley

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Littler Mendelson

By Timothy S. Anderson

Attorneys for Defendant

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Sheila K. Oberto

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Stocks v. Office Max Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 1, 2011
CASE NO. 1:11-CV-00644 LJO-SKO (E.D. Cal. Aug. 1, 2011)
Case details for

Stocks v. Office Max Inc.

Case Details

Full title:RONALD STOCKS, Plaintiff v. OFFICE MAX INCORPORATED and DOES 1 through 10…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 1, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. 1:11-CV-00644 LJO-SKO (E.D. Cal. Aug. 1, 2011)