From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stockman v. Wilson Distilling Company, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 3, 1941
261 App. Div. 969 (N.Y. App. Div. 1941)

Opinion

March 3, 1941.

Present — Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ. [ 175 Misc. 314.]


In an action for a declaratory judgment to declare a certain fair trade agreement promulgated by the defendant to be ineffective, invalid and abandoned, plaintiff appeals from an order dismissing his complaint upon the ground that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and from the judgment of dismissal entered pursuant to such order. Order and judgment unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. ( James v. Alderton Dock Yards, 256 N.Y. 298; Ferran v. Woodside Wine Liquor Store, Inc., 256 App. Div. 1103.)


Summaries of

Stockman v. Wilson Distilling Company, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 3, 1941
261 App. Div. 969 (N.Y. App. Div. 1941)
Case details for

Stockman v. Wilson Distilling Company, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MARTIN STOCKMAN, Appellant, v. WILSON DISTILLING COMPANY, INC., Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 3, 1941

Citations

261 App. Div. 969 (N.Y. App. Div. 1941)