From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stockman v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Mar 30, 2012
Case No. CIV- 11-012-JHP-SPS (E.D. Okla. Mar. 30, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. CIV- 11-012-JHP-SPS

03-30-2012

NICHOLAS A. STOCKMAN, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant.


JUDGMENT

Pursuant to the court's order of March 30, 2012, remanding this action for further administrative action under the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. §405 (g), of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §405(g), the court enters judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant in accordance with the provisions of Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

A remand pursuant to sentence four does not allow for retention of district court jurisdiction. See Shalala v. Schaefer, _ U.S. _, 113 S.Ct. 2625 (1993); Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991).

IT IS SO ORDERED this 30th day of March, 2012.

__________

James H. Payne

United States District Judge

Eastern District of Oklahoma


Summaries of

Stockman v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Mar 30, 2012
Case No. CIV- 11-012-JHP-SPS (E.D. Okla. Mar. 30, 2012)
Case details for

Stockman v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:NICHOLAS A. STOCKMAN, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Date published: Mar 30, 2012

Citations

Case No. CIV- 11-012-JHP-SPS (E.D. Okla. Mar. 30, 2012)