From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stockford v. The Christman Co.

Supreme Court of Michigan
Jul 19, 2024
SC 166711 (Mich. Jul. 19, 2024)

Opinion

SC 166711 (23) COA 366694

07-19-2024

JOEL STOCKFORD, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. THE CHRISTMAN COMPANY, Defendant/Cross-Plaintiff, and SHAW WINKLER, INC., Defendant/Cross-Defendant, and SODEXOMAGIC, LLC, Defendant/Cross-Defendant, Appellant, and LANSING SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant.


Ingham CC: 20-000262-NO

Elizabeth T. Clement, Chief Justice Brian K. Zahra David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Megan K. Cavanagh Elizabeth M. Welch Kyra H. Bolden, Justices

ORDER

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's April 29, 2024 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that reconsideration of our previous order is warranted. MCR 7.311(G).

BERNSTEIN, J., did not participate because he has a family member with an interest that could be affected by the proceeding.


Summaries of

Stockford v. The Christman Co.

Supreme Court of Michigan
Jul 19, 2024
SC 166711 (Mich. Jul. 19, 2024)
Case details for

Stockford v. The Christman Co.

Case Details

Full title:JOEL STOCKFORD, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. THE CHRISTMAN COMPANY…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Jul 19, 2024

Citations

SC 166711 (Mich. Jul. 19, 2024)