From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stockdale v. Stockdale

Supreme Court of Virginia
Sep 14, 2001
551 S.E.2d 361 (Va. 2001)

Opinion

Record No. 002485.

September 14, 2001.

Present: All the Justices.

Appeal from a judgment of the Court of Appeals of Virginia.

Affirmed.

James R. Cottrell ( Michael A. Ward, Gannon, Cottrell Ward, on brief), for appellant.

Llona Ely Freedman Grenadier ( Elaine M. Vadas, Grenadier, Anderson Simpson Duffett, on brief), for appellee.


We awarded this appeal to review a judgment of the Court of Appeals holding that the trial court's statement that the respondent, Donald Karl Stockdale, Jr., bore the burden of showing by a preponderance of the evidence that his relationship with his children would be substantially impaired by their relocation was error, but that the error was harmless.Stockdale v. Stockdale, 33 Va. App. 179, 532 S.E.2d 332 (2000).

For the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Court of Appeals, we will affirm that court's judgment.


Summaries of

Stockdale v. Stockdale

Supreme Court of Virginia
Sep 14, 2001
551 S.E.2d 361 (Va. 2001)
Case details for

Stockdale v. Stockdale

Case Details

Full title:DONALD KARL STOCKDALE, JR. v. PATRICIA MAXWELL STOCKDALE

Court:Supreme Court of Virginia

Date published: Sep 14, 2001

Citations

551 S.E.2d 361 (Va. 2001)
551 S.E.2d 361

Citing Cases

Sharman v. Diaz-Mendes

As this fact, even if unsupported by the evidence, does not undermine the trial court's findings regarding…