Stirman v. Michael

1 Citing case

  1. Bates v. Betty Ross Co., Inc.

    46 So. 3d 615 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)   Cited 5 times

    Bates contends that it was an abuse of the trial court's discretion to terminate arbitration and to refuse to allow the Amended Claim in contravention of Florida's liberal rule of allowing amendment of pleadings where there is no prejudice to the opposing party. See Stirman v. Michael Graves Design Group, Inc., 983 So.2d 626 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008). In determining whether or not certain issues fall within the scope of an arbitration agreement, the scope of the agreement should be resolved in favor of arbitration, not against it.