Stinson v. State

5 Citing cases

  1. Hamlett v. State

    350 Ga. App. 93 (Ga. Ct. App. 2019)   Cited 8 times
    Explaining that "the admission of other acts evidence under OCGA § 24-4-404 (b) is not limited to conduct resulting in a conviction"

    " (Citations omitted.) Stinson v. State , 294 Ga. App. 184, 186 (1), 668 S.E.2d 840 (2008). Importantly, the recent possession of the stolen item was not the sole evidence to support the burglary charge.

  2. Johnson v. State

    299 Ga. App. 706 (Ga. Ct. App. 2009)   Cited 19 times
    Holding that jury was authorized to find that defendant was a party to hijacking because he drove perpetrator to crime scene, had prior knowledge that perpetrator intended to steal car, and helped perpetrator flee the scene

    (Footnote omitted.) Stinson v. State, 294 Ga. App. 184, 184-185 (1) ( 668 SE2d 840) (2008); OCGA § 16-2-20 (b). "Mere presence at the scene is not sufficient to convict one of being a party to a crime, but criminal intent may be inferred from conduct before, during, and after the commission of a crime." (Punctuation and footnote omitted.)

  3. Stinson v. Warden Chambers

    4:21-CV-00119-CDL-MSH (M.D. Ga. Apr. 13, 2022)

    On April 4, 2008, Petitioner appealed his conviction, arguing that the evidence did not support guilty verdicts on Counts 2, 3, 9, 15, and 18. Resp't's Ex. 4, at 3-4. On October 22, 2008, the Georgia Court of Appeals affirmed each of Petitioner's convictions except for the Count 9 theft by taking conviction, finding the evidence did not support a felony amount and remanding Petitioner's case for resentencing on Count 9. Resp't's Ex. 5, at 1, ECF No. 17-5; Stinson v. State, 294 Ga.App. 184, 184-87 (2008). On September 2, 2009, the Muscogee County Superior Court granted the State's motion for nolle prosequi of Count 9. Resp't's Ex. 6, at 2, ECF No. 17-6.

  4. Romero v. State

    307 Ga. App. 348 (Ga. Ct. App. 2010)   Cited 6 times
    Finding that evidence was sufficient to show that defendant was a party to aggravated assault when defendant accompanied attacker to the crime scene and stood by while another man attacked the victim

    (Footnote omitted.) Stinson v. State, 294 Ga. App. 184, 184-185 (1) ( 668 SE2d 840) (2008); OCGA § 16-2-20 (b). "Mere presence at the scene is not sufficient to convict one of being a party to a crime, but criminal intent may be inferred from conduct before, during, and after the commission of a crime." (Punctuation and footnote omitted.)

  5. In re J. S

    673 S.E.2d 645 (Ga. Ct. App. 2009)   Cited 8 times
    Vacating an adjudication of delinquency for second-degree damage to property and remanding for an adjudication of being delinquent for committing an act that would have supported a conviction for criminal trespass to property were the defendant an adult

    See Stinson v. State.Stinson v. State, 294 Ga. App. 184, 186-187 (2) ( 668 SE2d 840) (2008). (d) Theft by taking of a motor vehicle.