From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stinson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Mar 31, 2022
339 So. 3d 407 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

No. 1D21-3540

03-31-2022

Jerald Theodore STINSON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Ethan Rice of Lambda Legal, New York, New York, for Appellant. Caitlin Callahan and Brian Stekloff of Wilkinson Stekloff LLP, Washington, D.C.; Jeremy S. Barber of Wilkinson Stekloff LLP, New York, New York; Nicholas Guillory of Lambda Legal, Dallas, Texas; Gregory R. Nevins of Lambda Legal, Decatur, Georgia; and Kara N. Ingelhart of Lambda Legal, Chicago, Illinois; Scott A. Schoettes, Chicago, Illinois, pro hac vice, for Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Darcy Townsend, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Ethan Rice of Lambda Legal, New York, New York, for Appellant.

Caitlin Callahan and Brian Stekloff of Wilkinson Stekloff LLP, Washington, D.C.; Jeremy S. Barber of Wilkinson Stekloff LLP, New York, New York; Nicholas Guillory of Lambda Legal, Dallas, Texas; Gregory R. Nevins of Lambda Legal, Decatur, Georgia; and Kara N. Ingelhart of Lambda Legal, Chicago, Illinois; Scott A. Schoettes, Chicago, Illinois, pro hac vice, for Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Darcy Townsend, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.

Roberts, Ray, and Bilbrey, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Stinson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Mar 31, 2022
339 So. 3d 407 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Stinson v. State

Case Details

Full title:Jerald Theodore STINSON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Mar 31, 2022

Citations

339 So. 3d 407 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)