From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stinson v. Hartley

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 4, 2009
1:09-cv-00213-OWW-SMS (HC) (E.D. Cal. May. 4, 2009)

Opinion

1:09-cv-00213-OWW-SMS (HC).

May 4, 2009


ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME


Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On April 27, 2009, Respondent filed a motion to extend time to file a response to the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Good cause having been presented to the court and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

Respondent is to and including May 27, 2009, in which to file its response to the Petition.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Stinson v. Hartley

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 4, 2009
1:09-cv-00213-OWW-SMS (HC) (E.D. Cal. May. 4, 2009)
Case details for

Stinson v. Hartley

Case Details

Full title:TERRAKEDIS STINSON, Petitioner, v. JAMES D. HARTLEY, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 4, 2009

Citations

1:09-cv-00213-OWW-SMS (HC) (E.D. Cal. May. 4, 2009)