From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stinson v. Doyle

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 21, 2007
No. CIV S-05-0361 FCD EFB P (E.D. Cal. May. 21, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-05-0361 FCD EFB P.

May 21, 2007


ORDER


Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 28, 2006, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed with thirty days leave to file an amended complaint. By order filed August 30, 2006, plaintiff was granted an additional ninety days in which to file his amended complaint. On December 21, 2006, this court issued findings and recommendations recommending dismissal for plaintiff's failure to file an amended complaint or request further time within which to comply. The same day, the Clerk received and filed a request for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41. In the five months since the filing of the request, plaintiff has filed nothing further. It appears plaintiff has indeed abandoned his case and his request to dismiss without prejudice will be honored.

Accordingly, the Clerk is directed to close the case.


Summaries of

Stinson v. Doyle

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 21, 2007
No. CIV S-05-0361 FCD EFB P (E.D. Cal. May. 21, 2007)
Case details for

Stinson v. Doyle

Case Details

Full title:MARK LEE STINSON, Plaintiff, v. DOYLE, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 21, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-05-0361 FCD EFB P (E.D. Cal. May. 21, 2007)