Stinson v. Barr

Full title: VLAD STINSON #089252161, Petitioner v. WILLIAM BARR, ET AL, Respondents

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

Date published: Apr 20, 2021

CIVIL DOCKET NO. 1:20-CV-01313-P (W.D. La. Apr. 20, 2021)

Opinion

CIVIL DOCKET NO. 1:20-CV-01313-P

04-20-2021

VLAD STINSON #089252161, Petitioner v. WILLIAM BARR, ET AL, Respondents

JUDGE DAVID C. JOSEPH

MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOSEPH H.L. PEREZ-MONTES

JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein [ECF No. 7], and after a de novo review of the record, including the Respondents' Response [ECF No. 5], and the Petitioner's Reply [ECF No. 6], and concurring with the Magistrate Judge's findings under the applicable law;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Plaintiff's "Verified Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus and Complaint for Declaratory Relief and Motion for Immediate Rule to Show Cause Hearing" under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 [ECF No. 1] is DENIED and DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

THUS, DONE AND SIGNED in Chambers on this 20^th day of April 2021.

/s/_________

DAVID C. JOSEPH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE