From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stines v. Bernal

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 12, 2022
21-CV-7884 (JGK) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 12, 2022)

Opinion

21-CV-7884 (JGK)

07-12-2022

KIMBERLY STINES, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH BERNAL, ET AL., Defendants.


ORDER

JOHN G. KOELTL, DISTRICT JUDGE

By Order dated June 23, 2022, the Court directed the plaintiff to advise the Court whether the defendants other than Fordham University have been properly served. ECF No. 31. The plaintiff's notice to the Court, ECF No. 34, makes no effort to explain whether the defendants other than Fordham University have been properly served. In order to be entitled to a clerk's certificate of default, the plaintiff must demonstrate that service was proper. By July 15, 2022, the plaintiff is directed to submit a letter explaining whether service by certified mail constitutes proper service under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4. The plaintiff should provide citations to the relevant legal authority.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Stines v. Bernal

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 12, 2022
21-CV-7884 (JGK) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 12, 2022)
Case details for

Stines v. Bernal

Case Details

Full title:KIMBERLY STINES, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH BERNAL, ET AL., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jul 12, 2022

Citations

21-CV-7884 (JGK) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 12, 2022)