From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stiner v. Brookdale Senior Living, Inc.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 16, 2024
4:17-cv-03962-HSG (N.D. Cal. Aug. 16, 2024)

Opinion

4:17-cv-03962-HSG

08-16-2024

STACIA STINER et al., Plaintiffs, v. BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING, INC. et al., Defendants.


ORDER ON ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR AN ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO SUBMIT OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DECERTIFY THE RULE 23(B)(2) ACCESS BARRIER SUBCLASSES

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. JUDGE

Before the Court is Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion for an Order Extending Time for Plaintiffs to Submit their Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Decertify the Rule 23(b)(2) Access Barrier Subclasses. Having considered the motion, the Declaration submitted in support of the motion, relevant legal authority and the pleadings in this case, the Court hereby FINDS and ORDERS as follows:

1. Good Cause exists for granting Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion for the reasons stated therein.

2. The deadline for Plaintiffs to file their Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Decertify the Rule 23(b)(2) Access Barrier Subclasses is extended to September 3, 2024.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Stiner v. Brookdale Senior Living, Inc.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 16, 2024
4:17-cv-03962-HSG (N.D. Cal. Aug. 16, 2024)
Case details for

Stiner v. Brookdale Senior Living, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:STACIA STINER et al., Plaintiffs, v. BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING, INC. et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Aug 16, 2024

Citations

4:17-cv-03962-HSG (N.D. Cal. Aug. 16, 2024)