From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stine v. Pennsylvania State Police

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Nov 20, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:09-CV-0944 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 20, 2009)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:09-CV-0944.

November 20, 2009


ORDER


AND NOW, this 20th day of November, 2009, upon consideration of defendants' motion to dismiss (Doc. 8), and it appearing that plaintiff's have filed an amended complaint (see Doc. 15), and that the amended complaint renders the original complaint a legal nullity, see Snyder v. Pascack Valley Hosp., 303 F.3d 271, 276 (3d Cir. 2002) ("An amended complaint supercedes the original version in providing the blueprint for the future course of the lawsuit."); 6 CHARLES ALAN WRIGHT ET AL., FEDERAL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE § 1476 (3d ed. 2004) ("Once an amended pleading is interposed, the original pleading no longer performs any function in the case. . . ."), it is hereby ORDERED that the motion to dismiss the first amended complaint (Doc. 8) is DENIED as moot.


Summaries of

Stine v. Pennsylvania State Police

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Nov 20, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:09-CV-0944 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 20, 2009)
Case details for

Stine v. Pennsylvania State Police

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER L. STINE, Plaintiff v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, BUREAU OF…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Nov 20, 2009

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:09-CV-0944 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 20, 2009)