From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stimson v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVSION
Dec 28, 2018
2:17-cv-13458-TGB-DRG (E.D. Mich. Dec. 28, 2018)

Opinion

2:17-cv-13458-TGB-DRG

12-28-2018

APRIL STIMSON, Plaintiff, v. NANCY BERRYHILL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.



HON. DAVID R. GRAND ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge David R. Grand's November 21, 2018 Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 24) recommending that the Defendant Acting Commissioner of Social Security's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 14) be denied, and Plaintiff April Stimson's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 13) be granted in part to the extent it seeks remand and denied in part to the extent it seeks an award of benefits, and that this case be remanded to the Administrative Law Judge for further proceedings consistent with Magistrate Judge Grand's Report and Recommendation, as provided by 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

The Court has reviewed the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. The law provides that either party may serve and file written objections "[w]ithin fourteen days after being served with a copy" of the report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). As of this date, neither party has filed any objections to Magistrate Judge Grand's Report and Recommendation.

The district court will make a "de novo determination of those portions of the report . . . to which objection is made." Id. Where, as here, neither party objects to the report, the district court is not obligated to independently review the record. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-52 (1985). The Court will therefore accept the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation of November 21, 2018 as this Court's findings of fact and conclusions of law.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Grand's Report and Recommendation of November 21, 2018, (ECF No. 24) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED. It is further ordered that the Acting Commissioner of Social Security's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 14) is DENIED, and April Stimson's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 13) is GRANTED in part to the extent it seeks remand and DENIED in part to the extent it seeks an award of benefits, and that this case be remanded to the Administrative Law Judge as provided by 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings consistent with Magistrate Judge Grand's Report and Recommendation.

SO ORDERED. Dated: December 28, 2018

s/Terrence G. Berg

TERRENCE G. BERG

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that this Order was electronically submitted on December 28, 2018, using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification to all parties.

s/A. Chubb

Case Manager


Summaries of

Stimson v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVSION
Dec 28, 2018
2:17-cv-13458-TGB-DRG (E.D. Mich. Dec. 28, 2018)
Case details for

Stimson v. Berryhill

Case Details

Full title:APRIL STIMSON, Plaintiff, v. NANCY BERRYHILL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVSION

Date published: Dec 28, 2018

Citations

2:17-cv-13458-TGB-DRG (E.D. Mich. Dec. 28, 2018)