From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stimmell v. Harris

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 11, 2012
CASE NO. 1:12-CV-00155-LJO-BAM (E.D. Cal. Apr. 11, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:12-CV-00155-LJO-BAM

04-11-2012

ALAN STIMMELL, an individual, PAMELA STIMMELL, an individual Plaintiffs, v. KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General, State of California (in her official capacity as the Attorney General of the State of California); JUAN MORALES, a law enforcement Special Agent of the California Department of Justice, Office of Attorney General, but sued herein in his personal capacity; FRANK NAVARRO, a law enforcement Special Agent of the California Department of Justice, Office of Attorney General, but sued herein in his personal capacity; LUKE POWELL, a law enforcement Special Agent of the California Department of Justice, Office of Attorney General, but sued herein in his personal capacity; and other unknown state agents, sued in their personal capacity as DOES 1through 25, inclusive, Defendants.

Brian C. Leighton, CA BAR #090907 LAW OFFICES OF BRIAN C. LEIGHTON Attorney for Plaintiffs Alan Stimmell and Pamela Stimmell


Brian C. Leighton, CA BAR #090907

LAW OFFICES OF BRIAN C. LEIGHTON

Attorney for Plaintiffs

Alan Stimmell and Pamela Stimmell

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE


Barbara A. McAuliffe

U.S. Magistrate Judge

WHEREAS a Mandatory Scheduling Conference is currently scheduled in this matter on April 24, 2012, at the hour of 9:00 a.m., before the Honorable Magistrate Judge, Barbara A. McAuliffe;

WHEREAS Plaintiffs' counsel is currently involved in a bench trial in the Sacramento County Superior Court, before the Honorable Judge Raymond M. Cadei with said bench trial going into its third week starting April 16, 2012;

WHEREAS Defendants' counsel has consented to a continuance of this Mandatory Scheduling Conference due to the unavailability of Plaintiffs' counsel;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties to the above-entitled matter, through their respective counsel of record herein, that the Mandatory Scheduling Conference be continued to May 8, 2012, at the hour of 8:30 a.m., in Courtroom Eight (8), before the Honorable Magistrate Judge, Barbara A. McAuliffe.

Respectfully submitted,

_____________

BRIAN C. LEIGHTON, Attorney for

Plaintiffs

_____________

JOHN M. FESER, JR, Deputy

Attorney General

Attorney for Defendant

ORDER

Having reviewed the parties Stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Scheduling Conference is continued from April 24, 2012 to May 8, 2012 at 8:30 AM in Courtroom 8 before Judge McAuliffe. A JOINT Scheduling Conference Report, carefully prepared and executed by all counsel, shall be electronically filed in full compliance with the requirements set forth in the Order Setting Mandatory Scheduling Conference, one (1) full week prior to the Scheduling Conference, and a copy shall be e-mailed, in WordPerfect or Word format, to bamorders@caed.uscourts.gov.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Barbara A. McAuliffe

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Stimmell v. Harris

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 11, 2012
CASE NO. 1:12-CV-00155-LJO-BAM (E.D. Cal. Apr. 11, 2012)
Case details for

Stimmell v. Harris

Case Details

Full title:ALAN STIMMELL, an individual, PAMELA STIMMELL, an individual Plaintiffs…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 11, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 1:12-CV-00155-LJO-BAM (E.D. Cal. Apr. 11, 2012)