From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stiltner v. Hart

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION AT LEXINGTON
Aug 3, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:13-203 (E.D. Ky. Aug. 3, 2018)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:13-203

08-03-2018

ROY STILTNER, Plaintiff v. DeEDRA HART, Warden Defendant


OPINION AND ORDER

*** *** *** ***

This matter is before the Court on the motion (DE 160) by the defendant, Warden DeEdra Hart, to amend her answer to the plaintiff's petition for habeas corpus relief, which was filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The magistrate judge has reviewed the motion to amend and recommends that the Court deny it (DE 168). The warden has not filed any objections to that recommendation. Further, the Court has reviewed the recommendation and agrees with its analysis and conclusions. Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS:

1) The magistrate judge's Recommended Disposition (DE 168) is ADOPTED as the Court's opinion; and

2) The warden's motion to amend her answer (DE 160) is DENIED.

Signed By:

Karen K . Caldwell

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Stiltner v. Hart

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION AT LEXINGTON
Aug 3, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:13-203 (E.D. Ky. Aug. 3, 2018)
Case details for

Stiltner v. Hart

Case Details

Full title:ROY STILTNER, Plaintiff v. DeEDRA HART, Warden Defendant

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION AT LEXINGTON

Date published: Aug 3, 2018

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:13-203 (E.D. Ky. Aug. 3, 2018)

Citing Cases

Memphis A. Phillip Randolph Inst. v. Hargett

But even if the party can show both required elements of laches, the court is not required to apply laches;…

Corizon, LLC. v. Wainwright

But even if the party can show both required elements of laches, the court is not required to apply laches;…