From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stikeleather v. Park Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina
May 1, 1924
123 S.E. 67 (N.C. 1924)

Opinion

(Filed 31 May, 1924.)

APPEAL by plaintiff from McElroy, J., at September Term, 1923, of BUNCOMBE.

Martin, Rollins Wright and Marcus Erwin for plaintiffs.

Mark W. Brown for defendant.


The plaintiffs brought suit to recover certain commissions alleged to be due for services rendered the defendant in the sale of land. At the close of the evidence the judge dismissed the action as in case of nonsuit, and the plaintiff appealed. The evidence covers more than sixty printed pages and a minute statement of the portion most favorable to the plaintiff need not be made. It is sufficient to say that while we express no opinion as to the weight of the evidence, we think there was more than a scintilla to sustain the plaintiff's contention. The judgment is

Reversed.


Summaries of

Stikeleather v. Park Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina
May 1, 1924
123 S.E. 67 (N.C. 1924)
Case details for

Stikeleather v. Park Co.

Case Details

Full title:GILLILAND STIKELEATHER ET AL. v. ASHEVILLE PARK COMPANY

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: May 1, 1924

Citations

123 S.E. 67 (N.C. 1924)
123 S.E. 67