From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stievelman v. Donnenfeld Coal Company, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 30, 1936
248 App. Div. 469 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Opinion

October 30, 1936.

Appeal from Supreme Court of New York County.

Milton M. Gettinger of counsel [ Gettinger Gettinger, attorneys], for the appellant.

Stanley S. Groggins of counsel [ Schneider Groggins, attorneys], for the respondent.

Present — MARTIN, P.J., McAVOY, UNTERMYER, DORE and COHN, JJ.


The order should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs. A motion for a new trial on exceptions could not be heard in the first instance by the Appellate Division after it had been heard and denied by the trial court. ( Babad v. Colton Dental Association, 150 App. Div. 561; Starbuck v. Smith, 173 id. 954; Oglesby v. Massachusetts Accident Co., 212 id. 886.)


Order unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs.


Summaries of

Stievelman v. Donnenfeld Coal Company, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 30, 1936
248 App. Div. 469 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)
Case details for

Stievelman v. Donnenfeld Coal Company, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:PAULINE STIEVELMAN, as Administratrix, etc., of ALBERT STIEVELMAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 30, 1936

Citations

248 App. Div. 469 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)
290 N.Y.S. 725