From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stieben v. Dollison

Court of Appeals of Ohio
Mar 1, 1983
8 Ohio App. 3d 188 (Ohio Ct. App. 1983)

Opinion

No. 82AP-709

Decided March 1, 1983.

Motor vehicles — Administrative law — Registrar of motor vehicles — Issuance of licenses under R.C. Chapter 4507 constitutes exercise of licensing functions under R.C. 119.01(A) — Registrar's determination an "adjudication" under R.C. 119.01(D) — Mandamus not available remedy.

O.Jur 3d Automobiles § 77.

1. The duties of the Registrar of Motor Vehicles under R.C. Chapter 4507, including R.C. 4507.08(A), with respect to operator's licenses as defined by R.C. 4507.01, constitute the exercise of licensing functions within the contemplation of R.C. 119.01(A).

2. The determination of a petitioner's right to an operator's license, or reinstatement thereof, constitutes an "adjudication" as defined by R.C. 119.01(D), and petitioner has available the administrative and appeal remedies provided by R.C. Chapter 119.

IN MANDAMUS: Court of Appeals for Franklin County.

ON MOTION TO DISMISS.

messrs. Lydy, Moan Douglas and Mr. Thomas G. Douglas, for petitioner.

Mr. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Jr., attorney general, and Ms. Susan C. Hayest, for respondent.


Respondent has moved this court to dismiss petitioner's petition for a writ of mandamus, asserting among other grounds that petitioner has an adequate remedy at law by way of appeal.

R.C. 119.01(A) defines "agency" to include "* * * the licensing functions of any administrative or execution officer, department, division, [or] bureau * * * of the government of the state having the authority or responsibility of issuing, suspending, revoking, or canceling licenses. * * *" The duties of the Registrar of Motor Vehicles under R.C. Chapter 4507, including R.C. 4507.08(A), with respect to operator's licenses as defined by R.C. 4507.01, constitute the exercise of licensing functions within the contemplation of R.C. 119.01(A). Accordingly, the determination of petitioner's right to an operator's license, or reinstatement thereof, constitutes an "adjudication" as defined by R.C. 119.01(D), and R.C. 119.06, 119.07 and 119.12 are applicable.

Since petitioner has available the administrative and appeal remedies provided by R.C. Chapter 119, he has an adequate remedy precluding mandamus as an appropriate remedy.

Accordingly, the motion to dismiss is sustained.

Motion to dismiss sustained.

WHITESIDE, P.J., and NORRIS, J., concur.


Summaries of

Stieben v. Dollison

Court of Appeals of Ohio
Mar 1, 1983
8 Ohio App. 3d 188 (Ohio Ct. App. 1983)
Case details for

Stieben v. Dollison

Case Details

Full title:STIEBEN v. DOLLISON, REGISTRAR, BUREAU OF MOTOR VEHICLES

Court:Court of Appeals of Ohio

Date published: Mar 1, 1983

Citations

8 Ohio App. 3d 188 (Ohio Ct. App. 1983)
456 N.E.2d 842

Citing Cases

Jones v. State Bureau, Motor Vehicles

Instead, almost four years later, he filed the current lawsuit. The principle in the present case is no…