Argued October 31, 1917
Decided January 8, 1918
Nathan L. Miller and J. Arthur Leve for appellants.
Nathaniel A. Elsberg and Francis Woodbridge for respondent.
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., COLLIN, CUDDEBACK, POUND, McLAUGHLIN and ANDREWS, JJ. Not voting: HOGAN, J.
Full title:SAMUEL STIEBEL et al., Appellants, v . EDMUND LISSBERGER, Respondent
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Jan 8, 1918
The rule putting the broker under absolute disability to purchase collateral deposited by the customer is not…
Hutchison v. Brown* * * Examples of cases where the order is executed in a manner contrary to the broker's legal duties are…